Lead Logistics

Tel: 084 200 2278 | Email: info@leadlogistics.co.za

X vs Twitter

In the dynamic world of digital marketing, professionals find themselves facing a complex challenge as they navigate the ever-evolving landscape of social media platforms. Their primary objective is clear: an increase in social media spending. However, this task becomes increasingly intricate due to the allocation of budgets in a fragmented environment.

At the heart of many discussions within the marketing sphere is the transformation of Twitter into a new entity known as “X.” This transformation aligns with the visionary ambitions of Elon Musk, who envisions creating an all-encompassing “everything app.” Concurrently, Meta made a significant entrance onto the scene with the introduction of “Threads” in July, positioning itself as a direct competitor to the enigmatic X. In response, other platforms have seized the opportunity to exploit perceived vulnerabilities within X. For instance, TikTok, traditionally known for its short-form video focus, has ventured into uncharted territory by experimenting with text-only posts.

While professionals in the field consider their options, caution and a measured approach are advised. The importance of encouraging experimentation with new social media platforms is evident, but over commitment should be avoided. Marketers are urged to assess whether they possess the necessary resources to effectively manage another platform, consider the app’s commitment to safety and security, and evaluate whether it offers essential capabilities or features.

Among the marketers considering engagement with Threads, a remarkable 52% are motivated by the promise of enhanced user safety and security—an aspect that has raised concerns regarding X. Threads rapidly demonstrated its marketing potential by becoming the fastest app to amass 100 million users shortly after its launch, although subsequent engagement levels experienced a decline. Meta has continued to enhance the service, recently unveiling plans for a web version rollout.

On the contrary, X grapples with a myriad of challenges, primarily the consistent departure of advertisers. This trend persists despite the appointment of advertising industry veteran Linda Yaccarino as CEO in May. Notably, of the 3,100 brands that advertised on X in May, 34% chose not to return in June, according to a MediaRadar analysis.

Although many marketers have explored alternative avenues following Elon Musk’s takeover of X, interesting trends have emerged. Thirty-five percent of those who claimed to have paused advertising on X have already reverted to previous activity levels, while 43% asserted that their companies never halted or suspended ads. These figures suggest that numerous brands continue to perceive value in the platform despite its challenges.

As marketers grapple with a multitude of options, it is notable that 40% are inclined to explore new platforms only when they witness their competitors achieving success on them. Additionally, the primary motivation for marketers to invest in novel platforms lies in their ability to effectively engage with their target consumers—a priority for 40% of those surveyed.

While certain emerging platforms have garnered significant attention from marketers, others, particularly decentralized platforms like Mastodon, Post, and Blue-sky, struggle with lower adoption rates in comparison to their more established counterparts. Furthermore, these decentralized platforms come with their unique complexities, particularly concerning the creation and utilization of user accounts.

In this intricate and continually evolving landscape, marketers face the crucial task of navigating the promises and pitfalls of each platform. Crafting effective strategies and successfully manoeuvring through the ever-changing seas of social media remain essential for achieving their objectives in this dynamic digital era.